vineri, 30 ianuarie 2009
fuck |fək| vulgar slang
verb [ trans. ]
1 - have sexual intercourse with (someone).
• [ intrans. ] (of two people) have sexual intercourse.
2 - ruin or damage (something).
According to Oxford Dictionary, "fuck" has two meanings
..that look like synonims.
miercuri, 28 ianuarie 2009
marți, 27 ianuarie 2009
Trailer bine pus in site frumos, aici!
(Død snø) Dead Snow - directed by Tommy Wirkola (january 2009)
* - apropos de ultimul film cu nazisti (pe intuneric) - Outpost - (2008) by Steve Barker
Blood - The Last Vampire (directed by Chris Nahon)
luni, 26 ianuarie 2009
Afro Samurai - Resurrection (2009) www.afrosamurai.com
vineri, 23 ianuarie 2009
alte chestii la wherethehellismatt.com
via Manciuc (da.. bere!)
joi, 22 ianuarie 2009
Banlieue 13 Ultimatum - réalisé par Patrick Alessandrin
They Wait - 2007 directed by: Ernie Barbarash
BUY IT NOW EDITION.
miercuri, 21 ianuarie 2009
PS: ..and please no Tedd(b)y Boys jokes!
Revin cu ceva proaspat in cateva minute.
marți, 20 ianuarie 2009
Mancam o banana cu mana stanga si molfaiam ceva din Carmen de Bizet mestecand, in timp ce cu mana dreapta faceam pipi.
Don't try this if you got personality or a bladder dysfunction.
Co-Presedintele fundatiei spune:
"Those of us who are free from religion like to imagine a world where instead of wasting our best efforts on some unprovable afterlife, we humans could concentrate on leaving this world a better place for future generations. We should strive for 'heaven' here on earth"
Partial siropos, utopic si in mare parte adevarat, mesajul domnului de mai sus nu este o relevatie a secolului ..dar la cat de ignorat este, cu atat mai mult putem vedea ce se intampla de obicei atunci cand vrei sa pui piedica controlului. Ce anume? Nimic.
Din fericire "arsul pe rug" este azi doar o expresie jurnalistica. Speram sa ramana asa.
luni, 19 ianuarie 2009
sâmbătă, 17 ianuarie 2009
vineri, 16 ianuarie 2009
Sunrise.inc, producatorii seriei se vor implica indeaproape in minunatul proiect (vorbitor de limba engleza, of course). Da, proiectul. Kenji Uchida, Shinichiro Watanabe (geniul) si scenaristul Keiko Nobumoto trec drept producatori asociati (ceea ce este mai mult decat speram). Dupa 11 ani de la prima aparitie televizata a celebrei animatii japoneze si 8 de la cinematografizarea lung metrajului (Cowboy Bebop - The Movie) a venit timpul sa mai asteptam vreo 2 pana cand Keanu va face rolul vietii lui!
YES YOU HEARD ME, MATRIX-BOY! YOU BETTER DO THIS RIGHT!
Pana in 2011 va urez la multi ani de cateva ori, paste fericit si noapte buna.
* minunata cel putin pentru mine
The world should note the hand-crocheted shoulder-stock muffler and the anodized titanium plating. This fully functional firearm fires standard 7.62mm 125 or 150 grain ammunition with a muzzle velocity of approximately 710 meters per second and a maximum effective range of approximately 300 meters. Several choices in stock wood are available. With a limited run of
only 500, buy now before they're gone! A mere $100 extra includes Glambo's signature wood-burnt into the opposite side of the handguard.
A bargain at only $1072.95!
I know, i know, war is not fun.. but c'mon, we can change that!
yes we can!
gasit pe boingboing.net si aruncat pe vimeo
joi, 15 ianuarie 2009
miercuri, 14 ianuarie 2009
Price each: £2,344.13
Delivery: £75.00 (local)
Warranty: 3 Months
Condition: good (3/7)
Endless invaders from outer space push your skill to limit. Can you defend the earth? Move your tank accross the bottom of the srceen to avoid the enemy missiles and fire your laser missiles to attack the aliens. The green bunkers are your only defence against the attacking aliens, use them wisely, for once they are gone, the invaders will have no trouble blowing you up. Occasionally a flying saucer will apear across the top of the screen. Shoot it down for extra points. Simple yet addictive sounds, intense gameplay and beautiful cabinet graphics.
YES, i fuckin' need it!!
Remain sitting at your table and listen.
You need not even listen, just wait.
You need not even wait,
just learn to be quiet, still and solitary.
And the world will freely offer itself to you unmasked.
It has no choice, it will roll in ecstasy at your feet."
Learn to be quiet - by Franz Kafka
marți, 13 ianuarie 2009
Rule #1: There are no rules. There are as many ways to make a film as there are potential filmmakers. It’s an open form. Anyway, I would personally never presume to tell anyone else what to do or how to do anything. To me that’s like telling someone else what their religious beliefs should be. Fuck that. That’s against my personal philosophy—more of a code than a set of “rules.” Therefore, disregard the “rules” you are presently reading, and instead consider them to be merely notes to myself. One should make one’s own “notes” because there is no one way to do anything. If anyone tells you there is only one way, their way, get as far away from them as possible, both physically and philosophically.
Rule #2: Don’t let the fuckers get ya. They can either help you, or not help you, but they can’t stop you. People who finance films, distribute films, promote films and exhibit films are not filmmakers. They are not interested in letting filmmakers define and dictate the way they do their business, so filmmakers should have no interest in allowing them to dictate the way a film is made. Carry a gun if necessary.
Also, avoid sycophants at all costs. There are always people around who only want to be involved in filmmaking to get rich, get famous, or get laid. Generally, they know as much about filmmaking as George W. Bush knows about hand-to-hand combat.
Rule #3: The production is there to serve the film. The film is not there to serve the production. Unfortunately, in the world of filmmaking this is almost universally backwards. The film is not being made to serve the budget, the schedule, or the resumes of those involved. Filmmakers who don’t understand this should be hung from their ankles and asked why the sky appears to be upside down.
Rule #4: Filmmaking is a collaborative process. You get the chance to work with others whose minds and ideas may be stronger than your own. Make sure they remain focused on their own function and not someone else’s job, or you’ll have a big mess. But treat all collaborators as equals and with respect. A production assistant who is holding back traffic so the crew can get a shot is no less important than the actors in the scene, the director of photography, the production designer or the director. Hierarchy is for those whose egos are inflated or out of control, or for people in the military. Those with whom you choose to collaborate, if you make good choices, can elevate the quality and content of your film to a much higher plane than any one mind could imagine on its own. If you don’t want to work with other people, go paint a painting or write a book. (And if you want to be a fucking dictator, I guess these days you just have to go into politics...).
Rule #5: Nothing is original. Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination. Devour old films, new films, music, books, paintings, photographs, poems, dreams, random conversations, architecture, bridges, street signs, trees, clouds, bodies of water, light and shadows. Select only things to steal from that speak directly to your soul. If you do this, your work (and theft) will be authentic. Authenticity is invaluable; originality is nonexistent. And don’t bother concealing your thievery—celebrate it if you feel like it. In any case, always remember what Jean-Luc Godard said: “It’s not where you take things from—it’s where you take them to.”
citit si recitit pe moviemaker.com
Da, fontul ales este Comic Sans, pentru ca alaturi de Hagi, Nadia si Ion Ion Tiriac, isi merita locul in topul chestiilor care ne fac PR in lume. Si hai sa fim seriosi, Comic Sans este pana la urma:
Fara-de-Comic ..ceea ce ironic e o chestie, iar metaforic ne baga in ceata. Zis si facut.
luni, 12 ianuarie 2009
Any rebranding ideas?*
* intrebare foarte retorica
care am vb de ele..
vineri, 9 ianuarie 2009
joi, 8 ianuarie 2009
Although I would very much like to solve the problems of boosterism, simplism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity, there are several obstacles that make it difficult to resolve our disputes without violence. I will briefly adumbrate these obstacles and then refer to them occasionally throughout the body of this letter. Before I launch into my rant, permit me the prelude caveat that Ddb Bucharest is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. When I say that it is undeniable by anyone but demented, loathsome adolescents that a real fight against crotchety, possession-obsessed authoritarianism can be undertaken only if a basic change in social conditions makes it possible to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature, I don't just mean that it wants to make me the target of a constant, consistent, systematic, sustained campaign of attacks, that it wants to create massive civil unrest, or that it wants to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity—family, class, private associations. Sure, Ddb Bucharest indisputably wants all that but it also wants much more. It wants to squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies.
Ddb Bucharest wants to set the hoops through which we all must jump. What does it think it is? I mean, it recently claimed that once it has approved of something it can't possibly be perverted. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from it a hundred times before. If you understand that on that basis, I should, at this point, act honorably, then you can comprehend that if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem. Ddb Bucharest seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that its prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse. Ddb Bucharest's thralls' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.
While it is reasonable to expect that Ddb Bucharest relies on sweeping generalizations to "prove" that it is clean and bright and pure inside, it remains that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Ddb Bucharest". In it, I chronicle all of Ddb Bucharest's tractates from the venom-spouting to the incoherent and conclude that Ddb Bucharest's memoranda are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to step back and consider the problem of its subliminal psywar campaigns in the larger picture of popular culture imagery. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Ddb Bucharest shouldn't force us to tailor our whinges just to suit its bilious whims. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions call evil good and good evil.
Ironically, what we have been imparting to Ddb Bucharest—or what it has been eliciting from us—is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. I have a problem with Ddb Bucharest's use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, it doesn't need to prove its claim that McCarthyism is a noble goal; it merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Ddb Bucharest's indiscretions are indistinguishable from the ones it condemns." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to get my message about Ddb Bucharest out to the world, we must express our concerns about its imperious personal attacks. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because no one has a higher opinion of Ddb Bucharest than I, and I think Ddb Bucharest's a lackadaisical opportunist.
Ddb Bucharest's list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that it's an indefatigable spokesman for cameralism. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that corruption, lying, and hypocrisy are the fundaments of Ddb Bucharest's plans for the future. What may be news, however, is that it is hardly surprising that those who believe that it acts in the public interest are either naive or deliberately misled. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that Ddb Bucharest is completely gung-ho about pessimism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues.
Ddb Bucharest has no discernible talents. The only things it has indeed mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose Ddb Bucharest's also good at convincing people that I'm too craven to make this world a kinder, gentler place, but my point is that Ddb Bucharest has a vested interest in maintaining the myths that keep its camp loyal to it. Its principal myth is that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. The truth is that Ddb Bucharest's projects are merely a stalking horse. They mask its secret intention to let ophidian deadheads run rampant through the streets.
We must give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance. Bleeding-heart pipsqueaks don't really want me to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by Ddb Bucharest, although, of course, they all have to pay lip service to the idea. Although brevity is the soul of wit I do need to say quite a bit more about how Ddb Bucharest craves more power. I say we should give it more power—preferably, 10,000 volts of it. I'm not sure whether to classify Ddb Bucharest's hariolations under "paranoia" or "ignorance". This position, in large part, parallels civil libertarianism but with particular emphasis on the fact that I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes organizations like Ddb Bucharest want to block streets and traffic to the extent that ambulances can't get through. One cannot help but notice that Ddb Bucharest's prank phone calls are devoid of any intellectual substance, but given the way things are these days we must remember that the last time I heard Ddb Bucharest ramble on in its characteristically bibulous blather it said something about wanting to weaken family ties. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that.
Forgive me for boring you with all the gory details, but Ddb Bucharest has hatched all sorts of brazen plans. Remember its attempt to cheat on taxes? No? That's because Ddb Bucharest's so good at concealing its careless activities. It should come as no shock to anyone that Ddb Bucharest sees itself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who shine a light on its efforts to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought). Ddb Bucharest's shock troops argue that it is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. These are the same stolid cretins who put political correctness ahead of scientific rigor. This is no coincidence; Ddb Bucharest argues that I am acrimonious for wanting to prescribe a course of action. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.
Ddb Bucharest doubtlessly doesn't want me to show it how it is as wrong as wrong can be. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. Only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight. But the first step is to acknowledge that its deputies often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.
Ddb Bucharest's analects are worthy of a good flush down the toilet. How much more illumination does that fact need before Ddb Bucharest can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that instead of taking the easy path in life, the downward path, we must choose the upward path regardless of the pain, suffering, and sacrifice that this choice entails. Only then can we finally fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. Yes, Ddb Bucharest will try to stop us by turning the trickle of mercantalism into a tidal wave, but people often get the impression that smarmy freaks of nature of one sort or another and Ddb Bucharest's cringers are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that Ddb Bucharest's Praetorian Guard appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that if Ddb Bucharest had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why its précis have no redeeming value. My peers feel that it is incapable of looking with an open mind at anything that doesn't strictly endorse its views. While this is honestly true, I insist we must add that a clever liar can use the truth to tell a monstrous lie. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Is it a professional simpleton or merely a well-meaning amateur? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that one thing that it does well is generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to fight for what is right. The only way out of Ddb Bucharest's rat maze is to shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. It's that simple.
Yes, it's all about the complaint-letter-generator.
Get your own copy now!
marți, 6 ianuarie 2009
mai multe poze vezi la sursa.